Camden Iron Works Co. v. Sater
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Petition for writ of mandamus by the Camden Iron Works Company and another directed to Hon. John E. Sater, District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, to compel the approval and settlement of a bill of exceptions.
1Per curiam
Petition for writ of mandamus directing respondent to approve and settle bill of exceptions in the case of Camden Iron Works v. City of Cincinnati. Respondent’s reasons, given in his answer, for not approving and signing a bill of exceptions are, broadly stated, first, that no completed bill ready for approval and signature was ever presented to him; second, that respondent had lost jurisdiction to sign and settle the bill, because the time therefor had expired; and, third, that, if respondent still had discretionary power to extend the time, it ought not to be exercised because of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hunnicutt v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Kingman v. Western Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Shreve v. CheesmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Jennings v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Merchants' Ins. Co. of Newark v. BucknerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Morrissey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- In Re Bills of ExceptionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Dalton v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Camden Iron Works Co. v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- D. J. Moore Grocer Co. v. Pacific Rice MillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.