Legal Opinion
Muckelroy v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1934No. 9807PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Circuit Judge.
Appellant brought a personal injury suit which was removed to the United States court. A motion to remand was denied, and appellant refusing to proceed further, the petition was dismissed at the costs of appellant. From that dismissal this appeal is brought.
Appellees filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the appeal was not taken in time. The judgment herein was entered March 13, 1933; the appeal taken July 21, 1933. It is obvious that more than three months have elapsed between the judgment and the appeal and that the motion to dismiss should be sustained unless…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Jehiel Brooks, in Error v. Samuel NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Old Nick Williams Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Northwestern Public Service Co. v. PfeiferCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. LeverentzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Albert G. Rich v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Frank Gunther Et Ux. And Ethel and Oscar Heath v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Poynor v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Benitez v. Bank of Nova ScotiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940