Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Lips

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1922No. Crim. No. 826PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

By indictment it was charged that defendant, jointly with one W. J. Anderson, did “willfully, unlawfully, corruptly, knowingly and feloniousy ask, receive, and agree to receive of and from J. M. Furay and Mrs. Dede Furay” a certain bribe for the purpose of influencing their action officially as deputy sheriffs. The charge was based upon the provisions of section 68 of the Penal Code. Defendant was tried separately and now appeals from a judgment of conviction rendered against him.

Appellant’s first contention for a reversal of the judgment is founded upon the palpable misstatement that “The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. SchmitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. People v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. People v. SalsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. RiccardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Hughes v. PflanzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Bigio PastranaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1985
  2. United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. FinkelstinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API