People v. Finkelstin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Appeal from a conviction of bribery. Since appellant demands a reversal on the ground that he was the victim of an entrapment, a detailed statement of the evidence is essential to a full understanding of all contentions.
At the time of the occurrences mentioned herein appellant was a citizen of Oxnard where he had resided for 10 years and had operated a pawnshop. William P. Clark was the chief of police of that city; Alfred Jewell was sergeant of police and Edward L. Stanton was a police detective. On June 30, 1949, appellant inquired of Stanton concerning one Macros who had been arrested on…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. GlassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. LindseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- People v. BranchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. GaioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.