Legal Opinion

People v. Finkelstin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1950No. Crim. 4427PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Appeal from a conviction of bribery. Since appellant demands a reversal on the ground that he was the victim of an entrapment, a detailed statement of the evidence is essential to a full understanding of all contentions.

At the time of the occurrences mentioned herein appellant was a citizen of Oxnard where he had resided for 10 years and had operated a pawnshop. William P. Clark was the chief of police of that city; Alfred Jewell was sergeant of police and Edward L. Stanton was a police detective. On June 30, 1949, appellant inquired of Stanton concerning one Macros who had been arrested on…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. GlassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. People v. LindseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. People v. BranchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. People v. GaioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API