Legal Opinion

People v. Black

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1925No. Docket No. 1154PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

Defendants were charged with the crime of “burglary with explosives” under an information of three counts. The designated crime is thus defined and denounced: “Any person who, with intent to commit crime, breaks and enters, either by day or by night, any building, whether inhabited or not, and opens or attempts to open any vault, saie or other secure place by use of nitroglycerine, dynamite, gunpowder or any other explosive, shall be deemed guilty of burglary with explosives” (Pen. Code, see. 464). The first count of the information charges an entry into a store, building, or room of one…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. People v. SimonsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. BesoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. CastelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. People v. DegnenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. MehaffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API