Majer v. Fosseen
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
Plaintiffs Majer appeal from a judgment denying them, after expiration of the statutory 1-year redemption period, the right to redeem certain real property sold in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding.
The sole issue is whether the court abused its discretion in refusing to apply equitable principles and allow the redemption. This issue is presented on stipulated facts.
On August 27, 1960, plaintiffs executed a promissory note in favor of Securities Intermountain, Inc., secured by a mortgage on their family home. The note and mortgage were assigned by Securities Intermountain to Northwestern…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Odell v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Lien v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Block v. HooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Mohr v. SibthorpIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Miebach v. ColasurdoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Miebach v. ColasurdoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983