Vestevich v. West Bloomfield Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff 1 appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting intervention and setting aside a consent judgment. We affirm.
Plaintiff, owner of a piece of property zoned for residential purposes, commenced this action in 1988, challenging defendant’s continued enforcement of its zoning ordinance as unconstitutional. The trial court upheld the ordinance, this Court affirmed that decision on appeal, and the Supreme Court denied leave to appeal. 2 In the years that followed, plaintiff filed, but did not notice, a motion for reconsideration, and, citing that motion as pending litigation,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Paragon Properties Co. v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- D'AGOSTINI v. City of RosevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Precision Pipe & Supply, Inc v. Meram Construction, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Trendell v. SolomonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clohset v. No Name Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Green Oak Township v. MunzelMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hill v. L F Transportation, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Inverness Mobile Home Community v. Bedford TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Clohset v. No Name Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.