Trendell v. Solomon
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Defendant appeals as of right from a lower court order granting plaintiffs motion to enforce a consent judgment, and denying defendant’s motion to set aside the consent judgment and to reinstate the original complaint. We affirm.
i
The underlying complaint arose out of a dispute over an alleged partnership and a security interest in improved real estate given by plaintiff for a loan. Prior to the conclusion of trial, the parties advised the court that they had reached a settlement. The stipulation and the terms of a consent agreement were thereafter placed on the record. Afterwards, a formal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Dora v. LesinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Newton v. Security National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Third National Bank v. ScribnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clohset v. No Name Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Vestevich v. West Bloomfield TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Madison v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Angela Sims, Personal Representative of the Estate of Henry Nealy, Deceased v. City of Detroit, Kenneth Hayes and Danny NewkirkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Crego v. ColemanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.