Legal Opinion

Building Supplies, Inc. v. Gillingham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1943No. 28883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff on a lien foreclosure action, for building material supplied to defendants upon the order of one Iverson, a contractor, on March 5th, 6th, 7th, 10th, 13th, 20th, 25th, 31st, April 8th, 16th, 17th, June 13th, 20th, 26th, and July 2, 1941, totaling $458.50, together with attorney’s fees and costs.

The appellants assign the following as error:

“1. The Court erred in concluding that notice was mailed or given as provided by R. R. S. § 1133.
“2. The court erred in concluding that there was One (1) contract.
“3. The Court erred in allowing Two…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Valley Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. DriesselIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Flint v. BronsonWashington Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Lieb v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Turner v. Dewco Services, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Baker v. AltmayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Johnson's Wholesale Plumbing, Inc. v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API