Legal Opinion
Lieb v. Webster
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1948No. 30370PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J. —
The facts in this case are undisputed and are for the most part stipulated. The appellants were in possession of a piece of residential property which they had agreed to purchase from the respondents. The closing of the transaction was being handled through Caryl V. Webster, doing business as Webster Agency, Realtors, as escrow agent. He will hereafter be referred to as Webster:
The appellants deposited in escrow with Webster, on January 16, 1947, $5,358.20, which, together with $650 previously deposited, made a total of $6,008.20. This was the total amount which the appellants were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rosenthal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- William Gardam & Son v. BattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Brailsford v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
- Farrow v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Mankin v. ParrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Alaska Foods, Inc. v. American Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Leasing Associates, Inc. v. Slaughter & Son, Inc., and F. E. Slaughter, as GuarantorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- First National Bank of Independence v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Matsko v. DallyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Lechner v. HallingWashington Supreme Court · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.