Legal Opinion
People v. Baker
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 3, 1923No. Crim. No. 996PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinlatson, P. J.
By an information filed in the superior court of Santa Barbara County defendant was charged with the embezzlement of an automobile, the property of one O. P. Hazard. He was found guilty, and now appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The information charges that defendant, as a bailee, was intrusted by Hazard with a Nash automobile of the value of seven hundred dollars, and that on or about June 13, 1922, at Santa Maria, in the county of Santa Barbara, he feloniously and fraudulently, appropriated it to his own use.
Appellant’s main…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. RoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. HettickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- People v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Urciolo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- People v. HarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.