Jarman v. Jarman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Since the only exception brought forward on this appeal is to the order awarding custody of the child to the plaintiff, our consideration is limited to the question of whether the findings made by the trial judge support the order and whether error of law appears on the face of the record. Cox v. Cox, 246 N.C. 528, 98 S.E. 2d 879 (1957); Stancil v. Standi, 255 N.C. 507, 121 S.E. 2d 882 (1961); Prince v. Prince, 7 N.C. App. 638, 173 S.E. 2d 567 (1970).
In determining whether the findings support the order we refer first to the applicable statute, G.S. 50-13.2 (a) which provides:
“A…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Stancil v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- In Re the Custody of PittsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- In Re the Custody of MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Prince v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Falls v. FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Hensley v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Morris v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Anchor Paper Corp. v. Anchor Converting Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- In Re Donna W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.