Legal Opinion

Savage v. Savage

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1972No. 726DC117PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The one assignment of error brought forward and argued in defendant’s brief, based on an exception to- the order appealed from, challenges the Court’s action in awarding the custody of the children to the plaintiff. The one question thus presented is whether the Court made sufficient findings to support its order and whether error of law appears on the face of the record. Cox v. Cox, 246 N.C. 528, 98 S.E. 2d 879 (1957); Standi v. Stancil, 255 N.C. 507, 121 S.E. 2d 882 (1961); Prince v. Prince, 7 N.C. App, 638, 173 S.E. 2d 567 (1970).

The legal principles regarding child custody…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Swicegood v. SwicegoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Stancil v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. In Re McCraw ChildrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Paschall v. PaschallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Green v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Dean v. DeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Pendergraft v. PendergraftCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API