Legal Opinion
Gluckman v. Holzman
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided May 23, 1947PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Vice-Chancellor:
This is the determination of a problem of construction posed by a written lease containing an option to purchase, and supplemented by oral testimony as to intention.
A more elaborate statement of this case may be found in the opinion of this court disposing of a demurrer to the bill, see Gluckman v. Holzman, 29 Del. Ch. 458, 51 A. 2d 487, 491. I shall set forth here only such facts as I deem necessary to present an adequate picture of the problem now involved.
The complainant and defendant are both medical doctors. The complainant leased a portion of certain premises…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- King v. . LeightonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Gluckman v. HolzmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
- Crockett v. GreenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1870
- United States Building & Loan Ass'n v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Gould v. American Hawaiian Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- State v. CummingsOregon Supreme Court · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.