Legal Opinion

State v. Cummings

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1955PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by Charles K. Cummings, one of the two defendants, from a judgment which the circuit court rendered against him in the amount of $5,000 after it had entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. The subject matter of the action was an alleged indebtedness of $5,000 which, the complaint avers, was evidenced by a writing, dated October 5, 1951, signed by the defendants and which acknowledged to one Mary P. Burrell an indebtedness of $5,000. The complaint denominates the writing a “demand promissory note.” The plaintiffs in the action are, respectively, the executor and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Levine v. LevineOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Inwall v. Transpacific Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Rowe v. RoweOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Patterson v. Horsefly Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Williams v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. Rickard v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Henzel v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Slope County Ex Rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Consolidation Coal Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API