Legal Opinion

Shelby v. FACTORY FIVE RACING, INC.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 16, 2010No. 1:09-mc-10281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SARIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Carroll Shelby, the Carroll Hall Shelby Trust, and Carroll Shelby Licensing, Inc., (collectively, “Shelby”) allege that Factory Five Racing, Inc. (“Factory Five” or “FFR”), LK Motorsports (“LK”), and Internet Community Partners, LLC (“ICP”), have engaged in trademark and trade dress infringement with respect to several of Shelby’s marks and automobile designs. Essentially, Shelby contends that FFR is marketing knock-offs of the Daytona Coupe Cobra, one of its renowned racing and production cars. Factory Five has filed a Motion to…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cordell v. HowardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  2. David Demarest v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  3. Glock, Inc. v. WusterDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API