Legal Opinion

Glock, Inc. v. Wuster

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 9, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-00568-ATPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Glock, Inc. (“Glock”) sued Defendant The Wuster for patent infringement, trademark and trade dress infringement and dilution, unfair competition under both federal and Georgia law, false advertising and false designation of origin, deceptive trade practices, and unjust enrichment. Before the Court is The Wuster’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue [Doc. 23] (the “Motion”). After the Motion was filed, the parties engaged in limited jurisdictional discovery.

At this point,1 The Wuster raises essentially three…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United Technologies Corp. v. MazerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. William S. Manuel v. Convergys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API