Cordell v. Howard
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NATHANIEL M. GORTON, District Judge.
After consideration of defendants’ objections thereto, Report and Recommendation accepted and adopted.
DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Roger D. Cordell (“Cor-dell”) has brought this Bivens1 action pro se against four medical providers at FMC Devens in Ayer, Massachusetts. Cordell claims that the defendants, Casandra Howard (“Howard”), Karl Bernhard (“Bern-hard”), Herbert P. Beam (“Beam”) and John Asare (“Asare”),…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Feijoo v. Massachusetts Department of Public SafetyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Cheryl Donlon v. Hillsborough County, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019
- Johnson v. WolfgramDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Thiersaint v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022