Legal Opinion

Cordell v. Howard

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 20, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-10879-NMGPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NATHANIEL M. GORTON, District Judge.

After consideration of defendants’ objections thereto, Report and Recommendation accepted and adopted.

DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Roger D. Cordell (“Cor-dell”) has brought this Bivens1 action pro se against four medical providers at FMC Devens in Ayer, Massachusetts. Cordell claims that the defendants, Casandra Howard (“Howard”), Karl Bernhard (“Bern-hard”), Herbert P. Beam (“Beam”) and John Asare (“Asare”),…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Feijoo v. Massachusetts Department of Public SafetyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  2. Cheryl Donlon v. Hillsborough County, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019
  3. Johnson v. WolfgramDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  4. Thiersaint v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API