Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Pernicano

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1963No. 4609PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

Cal and Gertrude Boyd brought suit against Pernicano to recover damages sustained in a rear end collision. The jury found for Pernicano. The Boyds’ appeal, assigning as error defense counsel’s suggestion, made during summation, that the jurors “trade places with Mr. Pernicano” in deciding the case.

As a general proposition appellate courts declare error when, during summation, trial counsel has urged the jurors to place themselves in the position of one of the litigants, or to allow such recovery as they would wish if in the same position. Annot., 70 A.L.R.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norman Klotz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. Eldorado Club, Inc. v. GraffNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Pfister v. SheltonNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Lee v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lioce v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wyeth v. RowattNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Truckee-Carson Irrigation District v. WyattNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Cook v. SUNRISE HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Delaware Olds, Inc. v. DixonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API