Legal Opinion

Norman Klotz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 5, 1959No. 12575_1PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASTLE, Circuit Judge.

This diversity action was brought by plaintiff-appellee, Norman Klotz, hereinafter called plaintiff, against Sears, Roebuck & Co., defendant-appellant, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of the explosion of a sprayer purchased from defendant. As a result of the injuries it was necessary to remove plaintiff’s left eye. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff assessing damages at $100,000.00. The District Court entered judgment on the verdict and denied defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  2. Bale v. Chicago Junction Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Westbrook v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  4. Jennings v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Spray-Rite Service Corporation, an Iowa Corporation v. Monsanto Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Ouachita National Bank, Curator of the Estate of Ted Rodgers Barbara Rodgers and Ted Rodgers v. Tosco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. Hugh Joseph, Administrator of the Estate of Mark Joseph, A/K/A Larry Jones v. David Brierton, Warden, Stateville Correctional Center, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API