Delaware Olds, Inc. v. Dixon
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
In this civil action for assault and battery, a Superior Court jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. On defendants’ motion, the Court ordered a new trial on the issue of damages, holding that it was error for plaintiff’s counsel in his summation to ask the jurors to place themselves in plaintiff’s position. 1 We conclude that a new trial should be ordered as to liability as well as to damages.
The form of appeal made to the jury in this case is commonly known as the “golden rule argument.” Briefly, a
“ ‘[g] olden rule argument’ is where counsel asks the jury to place themselves…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Jackson v. Southwestern Public Service CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Bullock v. BranchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Copiah Dairies, Inc. v. AddkisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Millen v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Warnie Lee Ivy, Cross-Appellants v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- DeAngelis v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Hechinger Co. v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.