Legal Opinion

Bell v. Bank of Perris

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1942No. Civ. 2484PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of respondents in an action for the removal of three deep well centrifugal pumps from a ranch property during the period of redemption in a mortgage foreclosure action. The trial court found that the pumps had not become affixed to the real property so as to pass title to the appellant, who was the mortgagee and also the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. The sole question to be decided upon this appeal is whether or not the trial court erred in concluding that the pumps in question were not fixtures.

On October 14, 1928,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hendy v. DinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Lavenson v. Standard Soap Co.California Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
  2. City of San Joaquin v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Escondido Union School District v. Casa Sueños De Oro, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Kruse Metals Manufacturing Co. v. Utility Trailer Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API