Legal Opinion

Emerson v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 21, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

I. Underlying the other issues in this case is the problem of the relation of the defendant and the city to each other and to the traveling public. The defendant owns gas mains, buried under the streets and used in the business of serving the public in the distribution and sale of gas. It is necessary to dig up the streets from time to time to make repairs upon the mains.

The statute provides that permission for the original location of the mains must be obtained from the city. P. L., c. 98, s. 1. It is conceded that such permission was obtained and that the mains were legally located. There…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. West v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  2. L'Esperance v. SherburneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  3. Bixby v. ThurberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  4. Wheeler v. Contoocook Mills Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
  5. Robertson v. MonroeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sandra G. Wilder v. Warren F. Eberhart, M.D., and Concord Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Larson v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
  3. Vallée v. Spaulding Fibre Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  4. Bartlett Tree Experts Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. Leavitt v. BaconSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API