Legal Opinion

Bixby v. Thurber

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 6, 1922PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.

Although there is one verdict against the two defendants, the questions concerning their several liabilities present different legal propositions. Their motions for a directed verdict raise the issue whether there was evidence upon which they or either of them could be found liable.

The landlord, Thurber, rests his claim of non-liability as matter of law chiefly upon the authority of decisions of which those in Maine and Massachusetts are typical. Those decisions are based upon the propositions that as matter of law the building was not a nuisance when leased, that if the landlord was in fault…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Melker v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Clifford v. Atlantic Cotton MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Call v. HaunTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Johnson v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1839
  5. Quinn v. CrimmingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bluemer v. Saginaw Central Oil & Gas Service, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Johnson v. Prange-Geussenhainer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Smith v. JC Penney CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Smith v. Congregation of St. RoseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Corby v. RamsdellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API