Legal Opinion

United States v. Olsen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 11, 2008No. 06-4307PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Timmy Brent Olsen appeals his conviction and sentence on fifteen counts of perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623(a). He contends that the district court abused its discretion by declining to sever three of the perjury counts, and that it violated his due process rights by finding a sentencing fact by only a preponderance of the evidence. We disagree. We do not discern an abuse of discretion in refusing to sever the counts, and any constitutional error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We therefore AFFIRM Olsen’s conviction and sentence.

I

A

Olsen’s perjury…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Cervantes-ChavezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API