Legal Opinion

United States v. Ray

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 1, 2013No. 11-3383PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This matter is before the court on appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc. We also have a response from the United States. Upon review, the panel assigned to hear this matter originally grants panel rehearing, in part, in order to amend Section II A of the original decision. The implicit request for panel rehearing contained in appellant’s en banc application is otherwise denied. A copy of the amended opinion is attached and shall be incorporated in this order. The clerk is directed to issue the amended decision effective today’s date.

The panel’s revised opinion was circulated to all…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. Rosales-MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Eric VallejosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Zar (Derek)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API