United States v. Griffith
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Submitted on the briefs: *
1Opinion of the Court
McHUGH, Circuit Judge.
APPEAL NO. 17-1365
In appeal No. 17-1365, defendant-appellant Stormy Bob Griffith timely filed a counseled notice of appeal challenging his conviction and sentence. He was subsequently appointed different counsel, who has since moved to withdraw from the case under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting there are no non-frivolous grounds for appeal. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a), and finding no grounds for appeal that are not "wholly frivolous," Anders , 386 U.S. at 744 , 87 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. LittleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. SteppCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. EarlsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. TaoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.