Legal Opinion

United States v. Griffith

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 24, 2019No. 17-1365 & 18-1054PublishedCited by 74 opinions

Submitted on the briefs: *

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Circuit Judge.

APPEAL NO. 17-1365

In appeal No. 17-1365, defendant-appellant Stormy Bob Griffith timely filed a counseled notice of appeal challenging his conviction and sentence. He was subsequently appointed different counsel, who has since moved to withdraw from the case under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting there are no non-frivolous grounds for appeal. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a), and finding no grounds for appeal that are not "wholly frivolous," Anders , 386 U.S. at 744 , 87 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. United States v. LittleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. SteppCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. EarlsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  4. United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. TaoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API