Legal Opinion
Lindauer v. Hill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 5, 1953No. 35512PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
By this suit, the plaintiffs, W. A. Hill, and some eighty-nine others, sought to enjoin the defendant, Loyd Lindauer, from enclosing, and stopping the public use of, an alleged street in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, being inversely to their appearance here.
On November 22, 1905, Francis M. Jordan and his wife, Rachel M. Jordan, the owners of a tract of land on the eastern border of Oklahoma City, platted the same into lots and blocks and certified the plat thereof, dedicating the streets and alleys to public use…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. McDowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Witsen v. GutmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Town of Chouteau v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Horton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Siegenthaler v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- The Choctaw and the Chickasaw Nations v. Board of County Commissioners of Love County, Oklahoma, and Texaco, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Green v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Barnes v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.