Barnes v. Clark
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
Ordinance No. 8096, enacted by the May- or and Board of Commissioners of the City of Tulsa, vacated a portion of Terwilleger Boulevard in the City of Tulsa, subject, however, to an easement reserved by the City of Tulsa. Clark et al., defendants in error, commenced this action to perpetually restrain and enjoin the defendants, the City of Tulsa and the individual defendants, from enforcing said ordinance and from closing Terwilleger Boulevard to public use and to the use of the plaintiffs, and from appropriating the lands located therein to their individual use and benefit.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apex Siding & Roofing Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Siegenthaler v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Maxfield v. MaxfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Rader v. Star Mill & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Lindauer v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- KTVB, INC. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- Parker v. ElamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Hunt v. Liberty Investors Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Leathers v. Commercial National Bank in MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Halliburton Company v. ScrogginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.