Legal Opinion
Hallenbeck v. Yuma County
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1944No. Civil No. 4568PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Superior Judge.
The principal question for determination on this appeal is whether a sale of realty to the sovereignty for delinquent state, county and power district taxes prevent the land sold from being taxed- for power district purposes after- tax sale has been completed and the land sold has been returned to private ownership. A better understanding of the problem involved will be had by a brief recitation of the facts:
The Gila Valley Power District is a corporation organized under Chapter 173, Session Laws of Arizona 1919. (Now appearing in the Arizona Code Annotated of 1939 as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Davis v. KleindienstArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Apache East, Inc. v. WiegandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Allied American Inv. Co. v. PettitArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Yuma v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.