Legal Opinion

State v. Reynolds

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1938PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The defendant and appellant, Hugh Reynolds, who will hereinafter be referred to as the defendant, has appealed from a judgment of conviction in a criminal case. The indictment on which he was tried contains three counts. The first count accuses him and Vern Bailey, Ray W. Blaine and V. D. McCauley of the crime of conspiracy to commit a felony; the second of the crime of riot; and the third of the crime of breaking the glass in a building not his own, to wit, a building in the city of Eugene, Lane county, Oregon, in a part of which the barber shop known as the City Barber Shop was then…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. BrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. KeckonenMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. JarvisOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State v. CarrOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State v. GillisOregon Supreme Court · 1936

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. BroadhurstOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. CaldwellOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API