Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1958PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

On December 6, 1957 an indictment was returned by the grand jury of Lane County against the defendant, charging him with the crime of sodomy in violation of ORS 167.040. The indictment charged that on September 27, 1957 the defendant sustained osculatory relations with the private parts of Robert Allen Jewell. The defendant pleaded “not guilty.” When the cause came on for trial the defendant moved that the State be required to elect a specific day upon which the alleged offense occurred. The State elected to prove that the crime occurred on August 1, 1957. Jewell testified that the last time…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PaceOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. EwingOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State v. RathieOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State v. GoddardOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State of Oregon v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. WimberOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. KristichOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. McKayOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. ShaferOregon Supreme Court · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API