State v. Caldwell
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
A jury found defendants Eric and Cindy Caldwell guilty of unarmed robbery. Defendant Ernest Sardella was the admitted robber; Caldwells were convicted as participants who helped plan the robbery. Only Eric Caldwell appeals. He claims there was insufficient corroboration of the testimony of the accomplices, Sar della and his wife, to sustain a conviction as required by ORS 136.550. The trial court refused to direct an acquittal on this ground. The court’s refusal is the basis of this appeal. The question is a close one and requires a review of the evidence. It will be helpful to first relate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. RosserOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. ReynoldsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. TownsendOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- State v. DugganOregon Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CarrollOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. SchoenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. McKendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. DosterOregon Supreme Court · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.