Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Taylor v. Bd. of Election Comm'rs

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 7,066PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Application for a writ of prohibition. The facts are stated.in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

In bank, Morrison, C. J.:

This is an application for a writ of prohibition under chapter 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The office of the writ is to *405“ arrest the proceedings of any tribunal, corporation, board, or person, when such proceedings are without or in excess of the jurisdiction of such tribunal, corporation, board, or person.”

The petition shows that the defendant, the Board of Election Commissioners, was created by “ An Act to regulate the registration of voters and to secure the purity of elections in the City and County of San Francisco,” approved March 18th, 1878; and that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maurer v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Thomas v. MeadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  3. Spring Valley Water Works v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Traffic Truck Sales Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Scharnikow v. HoganMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State Ex Rel. Saxtorph v. District Court, Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hobart v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Kalbfell v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API