Legal Opinion

Hobart v. Tillson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1884No. 8,342PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

By section 9 of an act entitled “ an act in relation to the assessment and collection of taxes upon personal property in the city and county of San Francisco,” passed April 18, 1874, it was provided as follows;

“ Sec. 9. The assessor may, at any time prior to the fourth Monday in October in each year, specially assess any property which may have been omitted, and which shall not be entered upon the regular assessment roll; and, if he makes any such special assessment, he shall forthwith deliver a copy thereof to the tax collector, and the original to the auditor, who shall charge the tax…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Camron v. KenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Maurer v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Spring Valley Water Works v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Farmers' Co-Operative v. ThresherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. People ex rel. Taylor v. Bd. of Election Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Swearingen v. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Winsor v. BridgesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Baines v. ZemanskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Cook v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. State ex rel. Robinson v. DurandUtah Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API