Legal Opinion
Globe Metallurgical, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 24, 2004No. Consol. 03-00202PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
This consolidated action concerns the claims raised by plaintiffs, Globe Metallurgical, Inc. and SIMCALA, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and defendant-intervenors, Bratsk Aluminium Smelter and Rual Trade Limited (collectively, “Defendant-intervenors”), who move pursuant to US-CIT R. 56.2 for judgment upon the agency record challenging the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) final determination, entitled Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value for Silicon Metal From the Russian Federation, {“Final…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Mittal Steel Galati S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Tembec, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Association of American School Paper Suppliers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.