Legal Opinion
Rush v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 23, 1984No. 84 Civ. 3219 (RWS)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
R. Stockton Rush III (“Rush”) commenced this action against Oppenheimer and Co. and Scott Seskis (“defendants”) in order to seek the recovery of damages for alleged violations of the federal securities laws (Count One), violations of common law principles of fraud and fiduciary duty (Count Two), and the Federal Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Count Three). Defendants moved for an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to (1) Rule 9(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., for failure to allege fraud with the requisite particularity, and (2) Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., for failure…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Armstrong v. McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Savino v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,508 Samuel Mihara v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc. And George GracisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Craighead v. E.F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Gas Reclamation, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,706 Barry Saxe v. E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc., Scott A. Howard and Hanger Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Rush v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- National Union Fire Insurance v. DeloachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.