Hanzel v. Good Earth, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appellant Myrtle Hanzel appeals from an order denying a motion for a new trial based on the district court’s refusal to include a jury instruction on res ipsa loqui-tur.
Affirmed.
FACTS
In April 1982, appellant-plaintiff Myrtle Hanzel sued Good Earth Restaurant for an injury she received as a result of biting into a walnut shell in a piece of carrot cake, served to her in the restaurant. A year later Hanzel amended her complaint to include two walnut distributors, Tochi Products and Bergin Wholesale Nut Co., and a California based walnut shelter, Ventura Walnut Shelling Co.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic & Professional AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- City of Ogema v. BevinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Fandel v. Parish of St. John the EvangelistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leuer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Hoven v. Rice Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Hoven v. Rice Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986