Legal Opinion

Hanzel v. Good Earth, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1985No. C0-84-1741PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant Myrtle Hanzel appeals from an order denying a motion for a new trial based on the district court’s refusal to include a jury instruction on res ipsa loqui-tur.

Affirmed.

FACTS

In April 1982, appellant-plaintiff Myrtle Hanzel sued Good Earth Restaurant for an injury she received as a result of biting into a walnut shell in a piece of carrot cake, served to her in the restaurant. A year later Hanzel amended her complaint to include two walnut distributors, Tochi Products and Bergin Wholesale Nut Co., and a California based walnut shelter, Ventura Walnut Shelling Co.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic & Professional AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. City of Ogema v. BevinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Fandel v. Parish of St. John the EvangelistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leuer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Hoven v. Rice Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Hoven v. Rice Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API