Legal Opinion
Leuer v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 16, 1990No. C7-89-1612PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant was injured by a bullet fired by one of the two respondents; the tort-feasor could not be identified. Respondent moved for summary judgment in response to appellant’s claims of res ipsa loquitur, joint enterprise, duty to warn and joint and several liability. This motion was granted. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Randall Leuer, his brother respondent Kelin Leuer and respondent Todd Johnson went deer hunting in November, 1981. The men separated, having agreed to return to the car at the end of the day. After respondents returned to the car, they went to tell…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Delgado v. LohmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dang v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Souder v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Burks v. Abbot LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- DeWitt v. London Road Rental Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Connecticut Interlocal Risk Management Agency v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.