Spannaus v. Otolaryngology Clinic & Professional Associates
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Todd, Justice.
This is an action to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by plaintiffs Vera L. and Fred A. Spannaus (Spannaus) as a result of the alleged medical malpractice of defendants. Spannaus appeals from a judgment entered for defendants following the granting of their motion for a directed verdict at the close of Spannaus’ case, and also from an order denying Span-naus’ motion for vacation of the judgment and for a new trial. Spannaus’ principal contention on appeal is that the case should have been submitted to the jury on the theory of res ipsa lo-quitur. We affirm.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hestbeck v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Yates v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Murphy v. KeatingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Dan F. Thompson v. C. Walton Lillehei, Geraldine B. Thompson v. C. Walton LilleheiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Jones v. Harrisburg Polyclinic HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Delgado v. LohmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Warrick v. GironSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.