Gendreau v. C. K. Smith & Co.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
On the defendants’ appeal there is no contention that there was insufficient evidence to permit a Superior Court jury to find the defendants negligent *990in connection with the contamination by gasoline of the properties and well water supplies of the plaintiffs. What is in dispute is the measure of damages applied by the judge on answers to special questions put to the jury, certain evidentiary rulings, and portions of the closing arguments of counsel for the plaintiffs.
1. The measure of damages. The jury were asked only two questions with respect to damages.4 In answer to one, the jury…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Belkus v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Rice v. James Hanrahan & SonsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Markus v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Manning v. Woodlawn Cemetery Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Sluskonis v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- One Wheeler Road Associates v. Foxboro Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Black v. Coastal Oil New England, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Hill v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Aimtek, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Bisson v. EckMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.