Legal Opinion

Aimtek, Inc. v. Norton Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 2, 2007No. 06-P-843PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The primary issue raised by these cross appeals is which statute of limitations is applicable to a bailment claim. The plaintiff, Aimtek, Inc. (Aimtek), brought this action against the defendant, Norton Company (Norton), some four years after *661discovering that Norton had scrapped two 1,500 gallon tanks belonging to Aimtek, which Aimtek had left on Norton’s property after the parties’ rental agreement for those tanks had expired. Norton maintains that the three-year statute of limitations for tort actions rendered Aimtek’s claim for breach of the bailment untimely. We agree with the trial judge…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Deerskin Trading Post, Inc. v. Spencer Press, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Flood v. Southland Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Freeman v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gibson Foundation, Inc. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  2. Baillargeon v. Kazanjians Garage, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
  3. Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2011
  4. Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2011
  5. E. Retail Props., Inc. v. Greenfield Prop. Dev., LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API