Legal Opinion

Hill v. Metropolitan District Commission

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 29, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

The plaintiff, Kathleen Hill, trustee of the A & P Realty Trust (A & P), seeks to recover from the defendants, the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC), and Creative Realty Trust (Creative), landowners adjacent to A & P, damages incurred as a result of oil contamination of A & P’s property. A & P’s complaint, as far as now relevant, was based on G. L. c. 21E, the Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Material Release Prevention Act. The jury found the defendants liable under G. L. c. 21E, § 5 (a) (l),3 for releases of subsurface oil onto A & P’s property, attributing only eight per cent of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNamara v. HoneymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Taygeta Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Tosti v. AyikMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Trinity Church in the City v. John Hancock Mut. L. Ins.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Guaranty-First Trust Co. v. Textron, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Scott v. NG US 1, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. TAL Financial Corp. v. CSC Consulting, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Buddy's Inc. v. Town of SaugusMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. G.D. Deal Holdings, Inc. v. Baker Energy, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2007
  5. Scott v. NG US 1, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API