Legal Opinion
Sluskonis v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 5, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
This is an action to recover for the death of the plaintiff's intestate, a girl five years and eleven months of age, at a grade crossing of the defendant's railroad and North Main Street in North Andover on May 11, 1933.
The trial judge directed verdicts for the defendant upon all counts of the plaintiff's declaration except the first count, which was framed upon G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 160, § 232, for failure to give the signals required by G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 160, § 138. In answer to special questions the jury found upon sufficient evidence that the signals were not given. The only exception is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Commonwealth v. DiStasioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Mercier v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Salem Trust Co. v. DeeryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Lamoureux v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. English Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Douglas v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Barrett v. Brooks Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Dunbar v. Ferrera Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Markus v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.