Sibley v. Alcan, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
This matter arises on Defendant Alcan Inc’s Motion to Quash Service of Process (Doc. 19) (“Motion to Quash”), in which Alcan, Inc. (“Alcan”) seeks to quash the most recent service of process attempted by Plaintiff. Plaintiff has filed an opposition (Doc. 21), and Alcan has replied (Doc. 22). For the reasons articulated below, Alcan’s Motion to Quash is DENIED and service of process is deemed to have been effectuated.
1. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Alcan is a corporation whose principal place of business is in Quebec, Canada. Plaintiff is a former employee of Alcan and/or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Nuovo Pignone S P A v. Storman Asia MVCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- R. Griggs Group Ltd. v. Filanto SpaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. HernandezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Richardson v. Clinical Computing P.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Zobel v. Contech EnterprisesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- AngioDynamics, Inc. v. NeubergerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018