Legal Opinion
Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Hernandez
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided September 2, 2015No. Case Number: 15-23032-CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMANPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING TRACFONE’S MOTION FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING SERVICE OF PROCESS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(f)
JOSE E. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon TracFone’s Motion for Order Authorizing Service of Process Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f) (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 7]. Plaintiff TracFone Wireless, Inc. (“TracFone”) seeks the entry of an order, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f), granting TracFone leave to effectuate service of process upon Defendant Juan Hernandez (“Hernandez”) via FedEx at his last-known address in Belize…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Leon v. Continental AGDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
- Ghostbed, Inc. v. Casper Sleep, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
- Alban Osio v. Maduro MorosDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
- Birmingham v. Rofx.netDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
- Birmingham v. Rofx.netDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.