Legal Opinion
AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Neuberger
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 5, 2018No. 3:18-cv-30092Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ANGIODYNAMICS, INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-30092-MGM ) WOLFGANG NEUBERGER, et al., ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S RULE (4)(f)(3) MOTION TO SERVE DEFENDANT WOLFGANG NEUBERGER THROUGH HIS COUNSEL (Dkt. No. 9) ROBERTSON, M.J. Plaintiff Angiodynamics, Inc. (“Angiodynamics”) filed a motion for alternative service on defendant Wolfgang Neuberger (“Neuberger”). Neuberger has not responded. For the reasons set forth below, the court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for leave to conduct alternative service. Angiodynamics…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Freedom Watch, Inc. v. Organization of the Petroleum Exporting CountriesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Bazarian International Financial Associates, LLC v. Desarrolloa Aerohotelco, C.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.