Legal Opinion

City of Stuttgart v. McCuing

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 13, 1950No. 4-9278PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The City of Stuttgart, in order to supplement a Federal g’rant awarded to improve its streets, alleys and boulevards, by proper procedure, on October 17, 1935, submitted to its electorate the proposition to issue and sell bonds in the amount of $75,000, for this purpose. The proposed bond issue was approved by a majority vote, and, by proper ordinance, a special tax levy of 3% mills on all real and personal property was duly levied by the City Council for the calendar years of 1937 to 1939 inclusive, and áy2 mills for the calendar years of 1940 to 1949 inclusive, to retire the bonds and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Bentonville v. BrowneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Oak Grove Consolidated School District No. 9 v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Blytheville v. ParksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Bell v. Crawford CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Lawrence v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. City of Searcy v. HeadleeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Keeton v. BarberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API