Legal Opinion

City of Searcy v. Headlee

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 30, 1953No. 5-290PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Minor W. Millwee, Justice.

Appellees are property owners in Street Improvement District No. 6 of Searcy, Arkansas. They brought this suit to require the district and its depositories to distribute and refund to appellees, and other property owners of the district, a surplus fund which remained after the purpose for which the district had been organized was accomplished and all its bonds, interest and other indebtedness had been paid. State Highway No. 67 traverses the paving district and state aid has been extended to the district at various times.

The appellant, City of Searcy, filed an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paving District No. 5 v. FernandezSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. City of Stuttgart v. McCuingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Searcy Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of SearcySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Street Improvement District No. 419 v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bell v. Crawford CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Keeton v. BarberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Bray v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bray v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API