Legal Opinion

Keeton v. Barber

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 1, 1991No. 90-163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is a taxpayer’s suit. The appellant, James Keeton, challenged the issuance of bonds by Pope County. The bonds were issued to raise money for renovation of the county courthouse. The ballot title by which the bond issue was presented to the people for approval referred to using money left over from a previous jail construction bond issue in conjunction with the money to be raised by issuance of new bonds. Keeton contends it was illegal to use the leftover jail money. He also contends it was illegal for the County to acquire land for and construct a parking lot for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vandiver v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Railey v. City of MagnoliaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Neal v. City of MorriltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. City of Stuttgart v. McCuingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Davis v. WallerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pope County v. Friday, Eldredge & ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2010
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API